Funded Trader Program Partner

Prop Firm ยท United States

Prop firm: authorization rate from 63% to 97% on $8M monthly volume after a BIN re-placement

Our funded-trader partner was losing more than a third of their transactions to declines. Re-placing the account on a strong acquiring BIN took the authorization rate from 63% to 97% and lifted monthly income overnight.

Headline metric

63% โ†’ 97%: Authorization rate after a strong-BIN re-placement

Supporting metrics

  • $8M: Monthly processing volume
  • Overnight: Monthly income lift from recovered approvals

The challenge

Our prop firm partner runs a high-volume funded-trader program across forex and futures, with $8 million a month in challenge-fee and account volume and an active global trader base. The product is solid, the marketing is working, and the customers are real. What was not working was the acquiring relationship under the volume. The authorization rate was stuck at 63 percent. More than a third of every legitimate trader payment was declining. The firm had been boarded on a BIN that was never configured for high-risk, cross-border, card-not-present volume, so issuers were soft-declining good transactions on merchant-profile and cross-border flags. On top of the lost revenue, the firm was overpaying on processing.

The solution

  • Re-placed the merchant account directly with an acquirer that openly underwrites funded-trader programs
  • Moved the volume onto a strong BIN built for high-risk, cross-border, card-not-present traffic
  • Corrected the merchant category coding so issuers read the transactions accurately instead of flagging them
  • Restructured processing onto interchange-plus with the markup spelled out, lowering the effective rate
  • Configured chargeback representment and VAMP dispute-ratio monitoring for failed-challenge disputes

The outcome

The authorization rate went from 63% to 97%. Nothing about the firm's traffic changed; the acquiring relationship and the BIN did. Recovering 34 points of approval on roughly $8 million of monthly volume lifted the firm's monthly income immediately, inside the first full settlement cycle after the switch. The interchange-plus restructure cut the processing cost at the same time, so the firm kept more of a larger number. The declined revenue had been there the whole time. It just needed an acquirer built to approve it.